Abstract

Humans tend to walk at speeds that minimize energy expenditure and time duration. While most walking experiments examine individuals in relative isolation, everyday locomotion frequently occurs in social contexts. We investigated whether walking speed is modulated in response to a social interaction during a cooperative task. Participants completed 96 randomized walking trials where they approached and retrieved boxes varying in distance (2.5-10 m) and mass (0-6.8 kg). Boxes either rested on the ground or were handed off by an experimenter, signaling prosocial effort benefitting the participant. Approach speed was measured with inertial measurement units placed at the feet and fit to a saturating exponential function of walking distance using a nonlinear mixed-effects regression model. Based on the energy-time optimization framework, we hypothesized that participants would approach more quickly when larger boxes were held at farther distances, to reduce energy and time costs of the experimenter, despite exerting more effort themselves. Participants walked 8.5% faster (1.29 m s-1 versus 1.19 m s-1; p = 3.85 x 10-6) when the largest box was held out by the experimenter versus left on the ground. However, the manner in which the box was held had no influence on approach speeds (p = 0.31). Exploratory analyses identified modest trends between experiment responses and individual characteristics, but none reached statistical significance. The findings suggest that locomotor decisions reflect not only an individual's own energy and time costs but also the perceived costs borne by others. This study demonstrates that social context can meaningfully influence walking behavior.